18H slide on 6H

Post Reply
Elow
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:18 am

18H slide on 6H

Post by Elow »

Can i slap an 18H slide on a 6H bell? I would think so but i would want to know before i buy a cheap one off ebay. Could i possibly make a dual bore .485-.500 if i swap out the top cork barrel assembly and out slide tube? Even better question, should i?
User avatar
BGuttman
Posts: 5967
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
Location: Cow Hampshire

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by BGuttman »

Can you? Yes. Preferably the newer ones that are 0.500". That was a way to fix a 6H with a bad slide.

Should you? Only you can tell.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
Thrawn22
Posts: 1281
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:18 pm

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Thrawn22 »

You just love diy projects don't you?
6H (K series)
6H (early 60s)
4H/5H custom bell
78H ('53)
78H (K series)
78H/36BG /2547 slide
8H
88HN
71H (dependant valves)
72H
35H alto (K series)
Elow
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:18 am

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Elow »

Thrawn22 wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2020 4:46 pm You just love diy projects don't you?
Ever since school let out ive got nothing better to do besides work. Who needs practice anyways
Klimchak
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 7:38 am

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Klimchak »

Yes, the .500” and .485” Conns have the same bell/slide tenons and are interchangeable.
User avatar
Doug Elliott
Posts: 3003
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
Location: Maryand

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Doug Elliott »

I can't think of any horns that are or were .485/.500, and maybe there's a reason for that. Might be interesting, but might also be a waste of time. It seems to me the connection of one of the slide tubes to the end crook will be problematic. I'd consider two closer bores before those two.
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
Elow
Posts: 1800
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:18 am

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Elow »

What about a getzen 300 slide? Those are compatible right? I might buy one off ebay and play around with swapping inners on the conn slide to make it .485-.500
Posaunus
Posts: 3485
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: California

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Posaunus »

Doug Elliott wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2020 8:33 pm I can't think of any horns that are or were .485/.500 ...
Perhaps not Conn, but thousands of Olds tenor trombones (Ambassador, Special, Super, Studio, Standard M7, Self-Balancing M7, Military M7) were dual bore 0.485/0.500"

Many of them played pretty well!
Kevbach33
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 10:00 pm

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Kevbach33 »

Posaunus wrote: Tue Aug 11, 2020 3:43 pm
Doug Elliott wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2020 8:33 pm I can't think of any horns that are or were .485/.500 ...
Perhaps not Conn, but thousands of Olds tenor trombones (Ambassador, Special, Super, Studio, Standard M7, Self-Balancing M7, Military M7) were dual bore 0.485/0.500"

Many of them played pretty well!
Wasn't there also a very rare Bach model that had this size or thereabouts? I believe it had been mentioned here before...
Kevin Afflerbach
'57 Conn 6H, Warburton 9M/9D/T3★
'62 Holton 168, Bach 5GL
Getzen 1052FD Eterna, Pickett 1.5S
F. Schmidt 2103 BBb Tuba, Laskey 30G
Wessex Tubas TE360P Bombino, Perantucci PT-84-S
John Packer JP274MKII Euphonium, Robert Tucci RT-7C
sporto
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2018 9:47 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by sporto »

Perhaps not Conn, but thousands of Olds tenor trombones (Ambassador, Special, Super, Studio, Standard M7, Self-Balancing M7, Military M7) were dual bore 0.485/0.500"

There was also a .485/.500 Martin Handcraft Imperial . Bore size number was 1A.. I had one.
Posaunus
Posts: 3485
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: California

Re: 18H slide on 6H

Post by Posaunus »

Doug Elliott wrote: Sat Aug 08, 2020 8:33 pm I can't think of any horns that are or were .485/.500, and maybe there's a reason for that. Might be interesting, but might also be a waste of time. It seems to me the connection of one of the slide tubes to the end crook will be problematic. I'd consider two closer bores before those two.
I guess lots of others knew this (I'm often late to the party), but I just learned that the Conn 30H "Burkle" (produced from ~1934 to at least 1949, perhaps as late as 1958) was dual bore, 0.494"/0.507". Conn's answer to the King 2B (0.481"/0.491"). I don't think they were ever terribly popular, but very interesting trombones. The hand slide crook was tapered diameter to accommodate the change in bore:
https://cderksen.home.xs4all.nl/Conn30H1940image.html
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”