Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post Reply
Bach5G
Posts: 2301
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm

Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Bach5G »

What are the differences? Shallow (or medium), shallow with open throat, backbore, deep with open throat and backbore?
User avatar
Burgerbob
Posts: 4637
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Location: LA
Contact:

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Burgerbob »

5 feels a bit shallower, much smaller throat (most importantly).

Here's my 5GS and 5 (left and right), both small shank, both '90s large letter mouthpieces.

Image

Image

Rim feels are also different... maybe the same size, but the 5GS is a bit wider with a different bite.

5G will deeper still, of course.
Last edited by Burgerbob on Thu Feb 27, 2020 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 3951
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Matt K »

Yeah so the Bach catalogue is sometimes a little difficult to decypher and references other portions of the document. So for small shank, which is catalogue No. 350 we have:
Model No Depth of Cup Approximate Cup Diameter Rim Shape Description
5Medium25.50 mmMedium wide, semi-flatFor players with good, natural embrouchres. Rather large cup. Produces a full, mellow, sonorous tone.
5GDeep25.50 mmMedium wide, semi-flatSame as No. 350-5 except for .276” throat and #429 backboresemi-flat.(same as No. 341-5G but with small shank).
5GBDeep25.50 mmMedium thin,very well rounded.Same as No. 350-5 except for thin rim same as No. 341-5G but with small shank).
5GSMedium25.50 mmMedium wide, semi-flat. Same as No. 5 but with larger “G” throat and #420 backbore.
6Medium25.50 mmMedium wide, well roundedFairly large cup. For players with a strong embouchure..Full, solid, mellow tone.
So you'll notice that it uses say, 350-5 to be the "5" and 350-5G to be what we call the "5G" in small shank. So a 5 is the same as a 5G but with a larger, 276" throat and a #429 backbore, per the description. Similarly, a large shank 341-5G is the same as a 350-5G other than the small shank. One thing you should note is that the 6 is actually part of the 5 series as far as rim diameter. Oddly enough, for the 5GS, it indicates that it is identical to a 5 but with a larger "G" throat and #420 backbore; howver, the 6 which has a similar description of cup depth does not indicate anything other than one evidently needs a "strong embouchure" to play it.

So the short of this is that for small shanks, the ones you asked about are all a "medium wide, semi-flat", 25.5mm rim. Out of just the "5" series, the "5" itself is the smallest of those. The 5GS keeps the same cup but adds a larger throat. The "G" adds yet a bigger throat and backbore. The cup is deeper, despite the description as being "the same as No. 350-5", which would contradict the depth of cup literally in the same row.

Now the large shank, catalogue no 341 has:
Model No Depth of Cup Approximate Cup Diameter Rim Shape Description
5GDeep25.50 mmMedium wide,semi-flatSame rim shape and diameter as No. 5 small shank tenor trombone. Similar playing characteristics to No. 4G with a slightly smaller cup diameter.
5GBDeep25.50 mmMedium thin,very well rounded.Same cup, throat and backbore as the No. 5G with a more rounded rim
5GSMedium25.50 mmMedium wide, semi-flat. Shallower “G”-style cup with smaller throat and backbore than No. 5G produces easy high register, slightly brighter sound
5GLMedium Deep25.50 mmMedium wide, semi-flatOld style, shallower model than No. 5G, facilitates upper range
So there is no official listing for a "5" in the catalogue, though I believe I've seen them (owned one?). But the differences between the large shanks in thi sseries are the same as the small shank versions.

But wait! As Aidan pointed out, there... are differences between the rims and cup depths of the 5 and 5GS. Yeah... For Bach stuff I use the catalogue as a go-to for generalities about the pieces but really not a whole lot more. There probably are instances of 5 and 5GS out there that are basically identical until the throat.
Kevbach33
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 10:00 pm

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Kevbach33 »

Curiously the catalogue lists the small shank 5GS as medium in depth, but as medium deep for the large shank 5GS. If they are the same mouthpiece with the exception of the shank, why would Bach label them like this? Anyone have an idea? I feel that the 5GS has the 5G cup shape but is somewhat more shallow, though not as shallow as the no letter pieces.

Large shank:
5GS Medium deep 25.50 mm Medium wide, semi-flat. .261” G 420 (modified)
Shallower “G”-style cup with smaller throat and backbore than No. 5G produces easy high register, slightly brighter sound.

Small shank:
5GS Medium 25.50 mm Medium wide, semi-flat.
Same as No. 5 but with larger “G” throat and #420 backbore.
Kevin Afflerbach
'57 Conn 6H, Warburton 9M/9D/T3★
'62 Holton 168, Bach 5GL
Getzen 1052FD Eterna, Pickett 1.5S
F. Schmidt 2103 BBb Tuba, Laskey 30G
Wessex Tubas TE360P Bombino, Perantucci PT-84-S
John Packer JP274MKII Euphonium, Robert Tucci RT-7C
User avatar
Burgerbob
Posts: 4637
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:10 pm
Location: LA
Contact:

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Burgerbob »

I would just ignore everything the catalogue says and play/check them out. I think it's been proven dozens of times that the catalogue is almost 99% marketing gibberish. "Teutonic," anyone?
Aidan Ritchie, LA area player and teacher
User avatar
paulyg
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 12:30 pm

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by paulyg »

Burgerbob wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2020 11:31 pm I would just ignore everything the catalogue says and play/check them out. I think it's been proven dozens of times that the catalogue is almost 99% marketing gibberish. "Teutonic," anyone?
It's a typo, supposed to read "tootonic."
Paul Gilles
Aerospace Engineer & Trombone Player
mrdeacon
Posts: 968
Joined: Tue May 08, 2018 2:05 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by mrdeacon »

paulyg wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:02 am
Burgerbob wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2020 11:31 pm I would just ignore everything the catalogue says and play/check them out. I think it's been proven dozens of times that the catalogue is almost 99% marketing gibberish. "Teutonic," anyone?
It's a typo, supposed to read "tootonic."
Bravo Paul!
Rath R1 2000s, Elliott XT
Bach 42 1974, Elliott XT
Holton 169 1965, Elliott LB
Minick Bass Trombone 1980s, Elliott LB
Posaunus
Posts: 3468
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: California

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Posaunus »

paulyg wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:02 am It's a typo, supposed to read "tootonic."
If you're too tonic, does that mean you're less dominant?
Bach5G
Posts: 2301
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Bach5G »

I’m feeling a little sub dominant these days.
Posaunus
Posts: 3468
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
Location: California

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by Posaunus »

Bach5G wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2020 4:10 pm I’m feeling a little sub dominant these days.
Sort of like "Red October?"
DDoghouse
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 7:59 am

Re: Bach 5, 5GS, 5G

Post by DDoghouse »

OY, this make my head hurt. I'm going to work on diminishing my 5th.
Doghouse Dan
I'm warning you - I have a trombone and I'm not afraid to use it!
Post Reply

Return to “Mouthpieces”