


You may be right. I was just going off what the seller told me. I’ll definitely update once I get the horn and find out more about it.
I agree. I didn't notice that the OP posted the serial number above until... after... I made prediction about its vintage. It always pays to just read!Posaunus wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 5:56 pm Andy and HawaiiTromboneGuy are probably right about its age. I should have looked it up.
According to the "Conn Brass Serial Number List"
130150 1913
132400 1914
137000 1915
142575 1916
It just looked newer / more "modern" to me. Wonder what the bore size is and what size mouthpiece it takes?![]()
Thanks!HawaiiTromboneGuy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 6:41 pm In any case, I will know more for sure once the horn arrives. I’ll take some detailed photos as well and upload them here.
It plays very well with both my Laskey 59MD and 93D. With the 59 it plays like a large tenor. With the 93 it feels like a mini bass. Triggered notes below the staff feel very open with very little resistance. Definitely an interesting horn.norbie2018 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:07 pm I cannot believe the amount of red brass on that instrument nor the shape it is in! Great find. How did it play?
Great detective work! It definitely looks nothing like Noah’s 66H.FEWeathers wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:15 pm Not a pre-66H, or at least it doesn't look like this one in the BrassArk Museum.
http://www.brassark.com/museum/conn66hold.html
Valid points. You are correct in that these were custom orders back in the day. It’s just interesting that although similar, they’re still different in their own ways.elmsandr wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:31 pm Nothing like? Except for all the tubes drawn on probably the same tooling and the same general layout of the wrap and same generic specifications?
There are a LOT of differences, but to me that is mostly explained by the fact that these larger professional level horns were all virtually custom orders then. I'd say Noah's 66H looks like this thing's child.
Cheers,
Andy