Page 1 of 1

Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 11:49 am
by heinzgries
After playing with my Bach 39 for a while and getting used to the slightly different slide positions, I got an idea. I really like the weight balance of the Bach alto. Since my custom Mittag alto has too much weight on the slide, I extended the connecting piece between slide and bell by 1,1 ".Now the bell section is further back, similar to the Bach alto. The weight balance is much better. Now i have to play with the tuning slide all the way in.
Image

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 6:27 pm
by timothy42b
Wow, nice work, looks like it was designed that way.

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sat May 30, 2020 7:14 pm
by Burgerbob
Doesn't that mess with ergonomics? Not to mention a large section of non-tapered tubing where there wasn't before.

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 2:36 am
by heinzgries
timothy42b wrote: Sat May 30, 2020 6:27 pm Wow, nice work, looks like it was designed that way.
The work was done by Torsten Mittag from the "Mannheimer Brassatelier. Years ago he had built this alto originally.

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 2:51 am
by heinzgries
Burgerbob wrote: Sat May 30, 2020 7:14 pm Doesn't that mess with ergonomics? Not to mention a large section of non-tapered tubing where there wasn't before.
Now the weight balance is better. The slide position in relationship to the bell flare are like the Bach 39.
I did not notice that the intonation had deteriorated. Lines up are in tune. Perhaps the upper altitudes are a little bit sharp. Now you can play a secure high enough :trebleclef: :line2: and Bb :trebleclef: :line3: in 1th position.
Also, the section of non-tapered tubing becomes shorter again, when i must pull the tuning slide all the way in.

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 8:22 am
by Crazy4Tbone86
I don’t think Burgerbob’s concern is the balance of the horn. I think he is wondering about the comfort of your left hand. It certainly looks like your thumb must reach back a long distance to reach around that bell brace.

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 12:16 pm
by heinzgries
Yes you are right, but this photo was made before i put a bullet brace on it

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Sun May 31, 2020 5:41 pm
by Crazy4Tbone86
Well....the bullet brace solves that problem!

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 3:21 am
by LeTromboniste
Wouldn't be a problem anyway. There are other grips that don't require to grab the bell brace and are just as (or arguably more) comfortable. I don't use the standard grip on any of my instruments except my Bach 42, because either the brace is flat and sharp, it's too far back, or the joint is friction-fit and can get loose from the slight tork of the standard grip. And even on my 42, it's the standard grip but with a Greenhoe tumbrest which doesn't completely feel like grabbing the bell brace either (it's forward and up from where the brace on a straight horn would be). Now that I got used to something else, grabbing the brace now actually feels weird and not very ergonomical to me.

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 7:17 am
by dukesboneman
Giardinelli Moutpiece?

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 11:27 am
by heinzgries
yes, 5C

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2020 4:50 pm
by dukesboneman
Heinz,
I would be nice to see the entire horn to put it in perspective

Re: Alto bell section behind

Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 4:23 am
by heinzgries
dukesboneman wrote: Tue Jun 02, 2020 4:50 pm Heinz,
I would be nice to see the entire horn to put it in perspective
Here is it with a Conn 34H slide which is modified in the same way. The tuning slide is copper gold platted. The mouthpiece is a plastic Tilz Doms 1 cup 26 mm midle deep, throat 5,5 mm. And yes, i am a lefty.
Image