Olds super recording trombone?
-
- Posts: 1897
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 6:18 am
Olds super recording trombone?
Anyone know if these were made or if there were only trumpet and cornet models. I think the concept was keeping the recording bell and changing the valve set on trumpets and corners so that could easily just transfer over to trombone but i’m not sure.
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3636
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
- Location: Maryand
Re: Olds super recording trombone?
Super and Recording were two different models.
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
-
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2018 2:05 am
- Location: Los Angeles, California
Re: Olds super recording trombone?
Trumpet only. Like Doug said... In the trombone world only the Super and the Recording exist.
Rath R1, Rath R3, Rath R4, Rath R9, Minick Bass Trombone
- JohnL
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:01 am
- Contact:
Re: Olds super recording trombone?
The Super Recording trumpet and cornet predated the Recording models by several years. Robb Stewart has an excellent article about the Super Recording models on his website:
https://www.robbstewart.com/olds-super-recording
Since the tenons are the same, the idea of a hybrid Super/Recording trombone has been explored many times. I don't think much of a Super slide (.485"/.500") on a Recording bell, but the Recording slide (.495"/.510") on a Super bell has some potential.
Olds did build a small number of larger bore Supers; the ones I've seen are .500"/.522". Never seen a Super in .495"/.510", though it's always a possibility.
EDIT: I neglected to mention that the larger bore Supers have larger bells, too, not just a larger slide on a regular Super bell.
https://www.robbstewart.com/olds-super-recording
Since the tenons are the same, the idea of a hybrid Super/Recording trombone has been explored many times. I don't think much of a Super slide (.485"/.500") on a Recording bell, but the Recording slide (.495"/.510") on a Super bell has some potential.
Olds did build a small number of larger bore Supers; the ones I've seen are .500"/.522". Never seen a Super in .495"/.510", though it's always a possibility.
EDIT: I neglected to mention that the larger bore Supers have larger bells, too, not just a larger slide on a regular Super bell.
Last edited by JohnL on Mon Aug 03, 2020 11:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 4273
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:54 pm
- Location: California
Re: Olds super recording trombone?
Like JohnL says, it's easy enough to assemble your own – just insert a Recording slide into a Super bell. I'd be surprised if there was a dramatic difference, but I'm happy to try the experiment (using my Recording slide) and report the results to you – just send me a Super bell!
- Doug Elliott
- Posts: 3636
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
- Location: Maryand
Re: Olds super recording trombone?
I think a Super bell section is quite a bit smaller than a Recording bell section, so it would probably play very differently than a complete Recording.
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
-
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 7:51 pm
- Location: Maryland
Re: Olds super recording trombone?
What Doug said..^^...........
I have both a Super and a Recording.
They're two horns with entirely different sounds.
I once swapped the slides/bells as an experiment.
Neither hybrid was an improvement over the factory set-up.
I have both a Super and a Recording.
They're two horns with entirely different sounds.
I once swapped the slides/bells as an experiment.
Neither hybrid was an improvement over the factory set-up.