Page 1 of 1
ID needed
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 10:42 pm
by WilliamLang
Hey friends,
Got a contact with a horn - interesting neck on it, definitely a King/White horn. Any other info from y'all?
LjAgpLlR.jpg-small.jpeg
4ECyZLJU.jpg-small.jpeg
Re: ID needed
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:30 pm
by BGuttman
Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.
Re: ID needed
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:50 pm
by JohnL
Based on the valve orientation and the wrap, I'm thinking late 1940's into the 1950's.
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 12:00 am
by Burgerbob
BGuttman wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:30 pm
Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.
The one I've played was large shank.
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 5:20 am
by afugate
BGuttman wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:30 pm
Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.
That was my initial thought as well. It looks like my 0.536/0.547 bore Symphony.
--Andy in OKC
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 5:59 am
by BGuttman
Burgerbob wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 12:00 am
BGuttman wrote: ↑Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:30 pm
Looks like an older Symphony. It should be dual bore: 0.536/0.547 (inches) and take a small shank mouthpiece.
The one I've played was large shank.
I played one in High School that took a small shank. Also had the valve mounted "upside down" with the mechanism against my chin.
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:15 pm
by WilliamLang
thanks all! learned a bunch here and much appreciated
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:26 pm
by Finetales
Looks just like the 1480 Symphony I used to own. Large shank...actually maybe a bit larger than large shank as my large shank pieces went very far in, like my Remington-shank Conns. Really a small bass, despite what the bore size would seem to indicate. Mine had a 9" bell, what's the diameter on this one?
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:27 pm
by greenbean
The wrap on this one is also different than other 1480's. King used at least two styles of wrap. I think King was experimenting a lot during these years. Maybe they weren't satisfied with this model. They were several variants of this horn.
The one above appears to have been re-lacquered at some point.
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 7:31 pm
by greenbean
In fact, I am remembering just now that the first 1480 I picked up about 5 years ago had a *small shank* mouthpiece receiver! It had been a school horn and I assumed that it was a customization, but perhaps it was a factory option. Though I would be surprised if that were the case.
I might still have that slide. It was pretty trashed and I think I saved it for parts.
Re: ID needed
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:28 pm
by JohnL
Absent the silver bell, it looks to be a twin to my late 1940's 1485. .536"/.546" slide with a King large shank receiver (neither standard Morse nor Conn-Remington). 9" bell with a large throat; the f-attachment bore is around .562". It has a tenon nut but not a slide lock.
I've seen an earlier version with the valve flipped the other way 'round and no tenon nut, and a later version with a slightly different wrap and a slide lock.e
Despite any superficial resemblance, it's a very different horn from the 4BF and the 4B-based 5B.