
That's right, all three in the same place!
Oddly enough, both tenors are Corporation instruments that were later converted.
The 36 is mine- pictures incoming of my widened slide with Shires brass .525 crook, courtesy of Benn Hansson.
This is exactly how I felt the sound was play testing a 50K3 a few years ago when a local store had a used one available. It would not be as easy to play in a big band, though doable. I wonder how many were made with gold brass bells.
I personally think they play quite well- the problem I have is getting in and out of the valve, say valve slurs. There's quite a long period where there's no ports open at all, and it's a heavy valve, so it's quite easy to whiff something like low G to low F in a quick passage. This is where Thayers really blow them away- there's no real point where a Thayer can't be blown through at all (not to mention the aluminum valves are quite fast) and it just feels better to move through the valve.tbonesullivan wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:11 am NICE! Those valves really are underrated. Maybe a BIT oversized, but they have a nice feel. On the 36, not sure it really helps, but it definitely looks nice!
Based on my sample size of 1, you're right. My 36 has shorter legs and receivers than either of my 42s.Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:43 pm There are two unique things that I have noticed about K valves over the years.
1. The valve has so much mass that it makes the trombone flat. Thus, the 42Ks and the 36Ks have shorter main tuning slides. I have heard that Bach actually sent some of them out as prototypes with normal length tuning slides and people complained that they were flat, so they shortened the tuning slides when the K valve went into production. I really don't know how much of that story is true, so please correct me if you know better.
I don't know if the 50Ks have a shorter main tuning, but I imagine a double K valve would really need it due to the high mass. In Burgerbob's photo, the main tuning slide on the 50 looks VERY short, but that could have been an after-market customization.
Nope. No 45s made that late, until the couple bells they made in the '00s.
I think mass in this case is length. Some valves add more length than what they replace.harrisonreed wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 10:20 pm It's interesting that more mass is proposed here as a way of getting away with shorter tuning legs (always a plus in my book). Does it matter where the mass goes to get a horn to go flat?
Aww... Got me excited. In that case, it probably added even wonkier length than what needs to be removed from the straight tuning sidesBurgerbob wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 10:34 pmI think mass in this case is length. Some valves add more length than what they replace.harrisonreed wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 10:20 pm It's interesting that more mass is proposed here as a way of getting away with shorter tuning legs (always a plus in my book). Does it matter where the mass goes to get a horn to go flat?
If somebody has a bass section lying around I’d be happy to adapt it to my 45 for the photo op. (That and I have a thing for obsolete valves)
Speaking of obsolete valves......I would love to get my hands on a Miller valve. The Miller valve was supposed to be the K valve that was done with higher precision and had better playing qualities. Anybody out there have a Miller valve?If somebody has a bass section lying around I’d be happy to adapt it to my 45 for the photo op. (That and I have a thing for obsolete valves)
Cheers,
Andy
From what I've heard... they're worse in every way. Plastic valve cores!Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:48 amSpeaking of obsolete valves......I would love to get my hands on a Miller valve. The Miller valve was supposed to be the K valve that was done with higher precision and had better playing qualities. Anybody out there have a Miller valve?If somebody has a bass section lying around I’d be happy to adapt it to my 45 for the photo op. (That and I have a thing for obsolete valves)
Cheers,
Andy
It's the word on the street. Designer was a lawyer.Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:02 pm Are you sure about that? A plastic valve core could have been a prototype. After all, the prototype Thayers had plastic valve cores (I know a repair tech who has one).
Wow! It's amazing how information just disappears. I did multiple searches about the "Miller Valve" designed by Robert M. Miller in St. Louis and found almost nothing. 10-15 years ago, there was chatter all over the Internet about those valves. I knew that not too many were made, but I always thought they were considered great valves. Anybody out there have one, every play on one, or do tech work on a Miller Valve?Burgerbob wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:48 pmIt's the word on the street. Designer was a lawyer.Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:02 pm Are you sure about that? A plastic valve core could have been a prototype. After all, the prototype Thayers had plastic valve cores (I know a repair tech who has one).
I had Bach make a 50K3 with a heavy gold brass bell, a nickel slide, with interchangeable leadpipes... I REALLY liked the way the valves played, and that sound in an orchestra... WOW... but it was limited. It did not function well in the studio or any commercial playing. I ended up selling it a few years later and went with a Shires... 9 years later, I moved from Shires to Rath. I wish now that I had the Bach along with my Rath... but I would probably want the Bach with only one valve with extended tubing.
There’s a Bach 42 with one posted for sale right now on Reverb: https://reverb.com/item/35098398-bach-s ... t=35098398Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:48 amSpeaking of obsolete valves......I would love to get my hands on a Miller valve. The Miller valve was supposed to be the K valve that was done with higher precision and had better playing qualities. Anybody out there have a Miller valve?If somebody has a bass section lying around I’d be happy to adapt it to my 45 for the photo op. (That and I have a thing for obsolete valves)
Cheers,
Andy
If you look at the photos of the valve it's clear that (1) the valve casing and lower bearing is yellow brass, and (2) the valve's axle is also brass.Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 10:11 am Thanks tntitan!
I might be interested in it but BurgerBob has me scared with this talk of a plastic valve core. I really wish there were some Miller valve owners who could chime in!
This valve is made of brass and has the resonance associated with a traditional brass instrument. It is made with traditional rotary valve construction and each valve is hand lapped for a tight seal. The valve operates quickly because the rotor is hollow and the actuating lever uses increased mechanical advantage to spin the rotor.
I remember these valves! Wow, yeah these were NOT popular!tntitan wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:10 amThere’s a Bach 42 with one posted for sale right now on Reverb: https://reverb.com/item/35098398-bach-s ... t=35098398Crazy4Tbone86 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:48 am
Speaking of obsolete valves......I would love to get my hands on a Miller valve. The Miller valve was supposed to be the K valve that was done with higher precision and had better playing qualities. Anybody out there have a Miller valve?
An optimistic price!HawaiiTromboneGuy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:26 am In case anyone is interested.
https://www.dillonmusic.com/used-bach-5 ... sn-143169/
That 10.5” bell + K valves must be heavy. At least you can get your workout in every time you pick it up!Burgerbob wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:32 amAn optimistic price!HawaiiTromboneGuy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:26 am In case anyone is interested.
https://www.dillonmusic.com/used-bach-5 ... sn-143169/
BTW, that 50KG you sold was a really great horn- got to play it a bit.
Wow, I’m pretty sure that’s the 45B I used to own. Bought it years ago from Ron Rosenbaum. Apparently it was a prototype 45B that Bach had made for Jay Friedman. If memory serves me correctly, Ron got the horn through a local auction in Chicago at some sort of benefit function. I’ll see if I can dig up old photos of it, but the bell did have that date etched on it.Ndwood wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 2:34 pm Speaking of the Miller valve, Josh Landress has a Bach 45 prototype in the shop with a Miller valve and plug-in rotor...
https://www.jlandressbrass.com/shop/Tro ... 594955.htm
You said $2700 is an optimistic price, for which price would you advise to buy one? I may be interested in getting one, but I don't really know what would be a decent price for it. Many thanks!Burgerbob wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:32 amAn optimistic price!HawaiiTromboneGuy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 10, 2021 11:26 am In case anyone is interested.
https://www.dillonmusic.com/used-bach-5 ... sn-143169/
It's optimistic for two reasons- K valves are seen as outdated, and the L bell is seen as really, really outdated. If it had the normal 9.5" bell it would be worth that price, or nearly so, I think. With the L bell without playing it first, not even close.Jesperiank wrote: ↑Sun Sep 12, 2021 9:45 am Hello everyone! I just discovered this new type of valve through the videos of Burgerbob, and I also saw the 50K3 which is currently for sale on the website of Steve Dillon.
You said $2700 is an optimistic price, for which price would you advise to buy one? I may be interested in getting one, but I don't really know what would be a decent price for it. Many thanks!